Market research · comparison

Japan vs China market comparison

Named ETF proxies for USD returns and available portfolio valuation, growth and yield measures.

Japan: Prices through Oct 30, 2026 · Fundamentals date unverified

China: Prices through Oct 30, 2026 · Fundamentals date unverified

PublicationOct 1, 2026
What the data shows

Japan's ETF proxy (EWJ) returned +16.46% versus -22.34% for China's ETF proxy (MCHI) over the available 1Y USD comparison window (Oct 30, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026), a 38.80 percentage-point lead for Japan.

USD · total return

Total Return

Japan+16.46%China-22.34%Difference+38.80 pp

1Y return · Oct 30, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · USD

JapanChina
ETF portfolio

Valuation

P/E
16.76×11.98×
P/B
1.82×1.46×
P/S
1.53×1.36×
JapanChina
ETF portfolio

Growth

Earnings (historical)
+12.05%+6.35%
Earnings (projected)
+12.05%+6.35%
Sales
+6.90%+5.92%
JapanChina
ETF portfolio

Yield

Dividend Yield
2.07%2.64%
JapanChina

Proxy measures

Japan vs China: comparable ETF proxy measures
Measure*JapanChinaDifference
1M return-4.67%-5.98%+1.31 pp
YTD return+15.70%-17.77%+33.47 pp
1Y return+16.46%-22.34%+38.80 pp
P/E16.76×11.98×4.78×
P/B1.82×1.46×0.35×
P/S1.53×1.36×0.17×
Earnings (historical)+12.05%+6.35%+5.70 pp
Earnings (projected)+12.05%+6.35%+5.70 pp
Sales growth+6.90%+5.92%+0.98 pp
Dividend Yield2.07%2.64%-0.57 pp
Scope, dates and definitions

Proxy: Japan · EWJ. USD returns of the named ETF proxy, not an exhaustive national index. Return prices through 2026-10-30. Fundamental characteristics: Sep 30, 2026 (reported or retrieval; legacy provenance unverified).

Proxy: China · MCHI. USD returns of the named ETF proxy, not an exhaustive national index. Return prices through 2026-10-30. Fundamental characteristics: Sep 30, 2026 (reported or retrieval; legacy provenance unverified).

* P/E, P/B and P/S describe the proxy's published portfolio valuation; earnings, projected earnings and sales growth retain their published definitions. Dividend yield measures the underlying equity portfolio, not cash distributions. Lower valuation multiples rank first; higher returns, growth and yield rank first. Group medians use covered peers with the same measure. These are descriptive comparisons, not recommendations.

ETF holdings, sector weights, currency exposure and reporting dates affect comparisons. USD adjusted-price returns include distributions where the underlying data permits. Charts use available stored history, not necessarily inception; comparison returns are rebased on common observation dates. Fundamental history requires three verified observations spanning six months and is never inferred from today's ratios.

Earnings (historical) is the provider’s historical earnings growth measure; Earnings (projected) is its long-term projected growth measure. LTM and NTM periods are not verified for these fields. Difference is the selected proxy minus its peer median (or the other proxy on comparison pages): multiples in ×, percentages in percentage points. Colour describes signed returns only, not investment attractiveness. Snapshot ranges connect the two displayed values; they are not universe percentile scales.

Metric definitions · Methodology and eligibility →

Informational only, not investment advice. Cached proxy prices refresh after the US close; proxy fundamentals are checked monthly and retain their own observation dates.